The FTI Award Journal

Exclusive content from our experts on bribery, corruption, whistleblowers and corporate accountability.

Corporate Enforcement Actions On The Rise

Statue of Justice

In recent years, the United States has witnessed a significant increase in corporate enforcement actions, as regulatory agencies and law enforcement agencies intensify their efforts to hold corporations accountable for wrongdoing. This surge in enforcement actions reflects a growing emphasis on corporate compliance, transparency, and ethical conduct in the business world. In this article, we will delve into the factors driving this trend, explore notable cases, and discuss the potential implications for businesses and the overall economy.

  1. The Regulatory Landscape

One crucial factor contributing to the rise in corporate enforcement actions is the evolving regulatory landscape. Regulatory agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), have bolstered their enforcement capabilities and become more proactive in investigating corporate misconduct. They have been given greater authority, increased resources, and additional tools to uncover and prosecute violations.

Moreover, legislative reforms like the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) have expanded the reach of regulatory agencies, enabling them to pursue wrongdoings more aggressively. This regulatory evolution has shifted the balance in favor of stricter oversight, leading to heightened scrutiny of corporate actions.

  1. Increased Interagency Collaboration

Another contributing factor to the rise in corporate enforcement actions is the improved interagency collaboration among regulatory bodies. Various agencies are now working in tandem to identify and address complex cases of corporate wrongdoing. This collaborative approach has proven effective in pooling expertise, sharing information, and coordinating efforts, leading to more comprehensive investigations and prosecutions.

For instance, the establishment of task forces comprising investigators from multiple agencies has enabled a holistic approach to tackle issues such as securities fraud, insider trading, money laundering, and antitrust violations. This level of collaboration has increased the chances of detecting and penalizing corporate misconduct, as it removes jurisdictional barriers and ensures a more efficient utilization of resources.

  1. Emphasis on Individual Accountability

In recent years, there has been a shift in focus from solely penalizing corporations to holding individuals accountable for their roles in corporate misconduct. This change is evident in the increasing number of enforcement actions targeting high-ranking executives, board members, and key decision-makers. By pursuing individuals responsible for illegal activities, regulatory agencies aim to deter future wrongdoing and create a culture of accountability.

The “Yates Memo,” issued by the DOJ in 2015, further reinforced this focus on individual accountability. It emphasized the importance of identifying and prosecuting individuals involved in corporate misconduct, thereby fostering a stronger deterrent effect.

  1. Notable Cases and Impact

Several high-profile corporate enforcement actions have made headlines, illustrating the severity of the issue and the determination of regulatory agencies to address corporate wrongdoing. One such case involved Wells Fargo, which faced significant penalties for fraudulent sales practices. The bank was fined billions of dollars and faced reputational damage, highlighting the repercussions of non-compliance.

In the pharmaceutical industry, the opioid crisis led to enforcement actions against pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors involved in the improper marketing and distribution of opioids. These actions have resulted in substantial financial penalties and criminal charges, signaling a commitment to tackling public health crises caused by corporate misconduct.

The rise in corporate enforcement actions has also affected the tech industry. Tech giants like Facebook and Google have faced scrutiny over privacy violations, anticompetitive practices, and data breaches, leading to hefty fines and increased regulatory oversight. These cases reflect the growing recognition that even the most influential corporations are not immune to regulatory action.

  1. Implications for Businesses

The increased focus on corporate enforcement actions has far-reaching implications for businesses. Companies are now compelled to prioritize compliance, risk management, and ethical practices more than ever before. Failure to do so can result in severe financial penalties and severe reputational risk. 

How To Report FCPA Violations

Reporting FCPA violations to the wrong people or in the wrong way can have severe consequences for a whistleblower.  If you are considering becoming an FCPA whistleblower, follow our guide on how to report FCPA violations

What Is The FCPA?

Have you head of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act at work?  In this guide we explain what is the FCPA and how you could claim a whistleblower award for reporting FCPA violations

How To Become A Crypto Whistleblower

Regulators are regulating fraud, crime and scams involving cryptocurrency.  If you have information on any of these topics, you could get a whistleblower reward for becoming a crypto whistleblower

Message via secure email

× Speak Confidentially via WhatsApp